Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Systemic Therapy With or Without Maximal Tumor Debulking.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining a sufficient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important in the palliative treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The ORCHESTRA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01792934) is designed to prospectively evaluate overall survival benefit and impact on HRQoL of tumor debulking when added to first-line palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC. In the present study, we report the HRQoL associated with this combination treatment compared with standard systemic therapy. METHODS: Patients included in the ORCHESTRA trial with clinical benefit after 3 or 4 cycles of first-line palliative systemic therapy with fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab were randomly assigned to maximal tumor debulking followed by systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone. Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory questionnaire at prespecified time points during treatment. Between-group differences in HRQoL over time were evaluated with linear mixed model analyses. A pattern mixture approach was applied to correct for missing questionnaires due to progressive disease. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were randomized to the intervention arm (n=148) or the standard arm (n=152). No statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in HRQoL and fatigue were observed when tumor debulking was added to systemic therapy. In patients of both study arms, HRQoL after 1 year of treatment was not significantly different from HRQoL at the time of randomization. Patients in the intervention arm experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) twice as often as patients in the standard arm (P≤.001). CONCLUSIONS: Maximal tumor debulking in combination with palliative systemic therapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC was significantly associated with more SAEs resulting from local therapy but no difference in HRQoL compared with palliative systemic therapy alone. There is a remarkable lack of association between the occurrence of SAEs and impact on HRQoL.

Local control and toxicity after magnetic resonance imaging (MR)-guided single fraction lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MR)-guided radiotherapy permits continuous intrafraction visualization and use of automatic triggered beam delivery, with use of smaller planning target volumes (PTV). We report on long-term clinical outcomes following MR-guided single fraction (SF) lung SABR on a 0.35 T linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Details of patients treated with SF-SABR for lung tumors were accessed from an ethics approved institutional database. A breath-hold 3D MR simulation scan was performed using a true FISP sequence, followed by a breath-hold 3D CT scan. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was first contoured on the breath-hold CT scan, which was then compared with contours on the 3D MR scan, before the GTV was finalized. SABR plans used step-and-shoot IMRT beams to a PTV derived by adding a 5 mm margin to the breath-hold GTV, and a 3 mm gating window was used. SABR was delivered during repeated breath-holds, using automatic beam gating with continuous visualization of the GTV in a sagittal MR plane. RESULTS: Between 2018-2022, 50 consecutive patients were treated, and 69% had a primary non-small cell lung cancer. Median PTV was 11.2 cc (range 3.9-53.5); 80% of GTV's were located ≤2.5 cm from the chest wall. Prescribed doses were 34 Gy (in 58%), 30 Gy (32%), or between 20-28 Gy (10%). After a median follow-up of 18.1 months (95% CI 12.8-23.5), the 2-year survival was 82% (89% for primary NSCLC and 62% for metastases). After a median follow-up of 16.1 months (95% CI 11.2-21.1), local recurrences developed in 2 patients (4%). The 3-year local control rate was 97%, and just 1 patient developed grade ≥3 toxicity (chest wall pain). CONCLUSION: MR-guided SF-SABR delivery to lung tumors on a 0.35 T linac, using repeated breath-holds with automatic beam gating, achieves good tumor control and low toxicity.

Unresectable Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Microwave Ablation (COLLISION-XL): Protocol of a Phase II/III Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although microwave ablation (MWA) has a low complication rate and good efficacy for small-size (≤ 3 cm) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), local control decreases with increasing size. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining interest as a potential means to treat intermediate-size CRLM and might be less susceptible to increasing volume. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of MWA to SBRT in patients with unresectable, intermediate-size (3-5 cm) CRLM. METHODS: In this two-arm, multicentre phase II/ III randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable, intermediate-size CRLM suitable for both MWA and SBRT, will be included. Patients will be treated with MWA or SBRT as randomised. The Primary endpoint is local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year (intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local control (LC) and procedural morbidity and mortality and assessment of pain and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for the local treatment of liver only intermediate-size, unresectable CRLM and studies comparing curative intent SBRT and thermal ablation are scarce. Although safety and feasibility to eradicate tumours ≤ 5 cm have been established, both techniques suffer from lower LTPFS and LC rates for larger-size tumours. For the treatment of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM clinical equipoise has been reached. We have designed a two-armed phase II/ III randomized controlled trial directly comparing SBRT to MWA for unresectable CRLM 3-5 cm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, phase II/ III Randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04081168, September 9th 2019.

Accuracy of deformable image registration-based intra-fraction motion management in Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy.

Background and Purpose: Intra-fraction motion management is key in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) gated delivery. This study assessed the accuracy of automatic tumor segmentation in the delivery of MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) by comparing it to manual delineations performed by experienced observers. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients previously treated with MR-guided SABR for thoracic and abdominal tumors were included. Five observers with at least two years of experience in MRgRT manually delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) for 20 patients on 240 frames of a cine MRI on a sagittal plane. Deformable Image Registration (DIR) based GTV contours were propagated using four different algorithms from a reference frame to subsequent frames.Geometrical analysis based on the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), centroid distance and Hausdorff Distance (HDD) were performed to assess the inter-observer variability and the accuracy of automatic segmentation. A Confidence Value (CV) metric for the reliability of the tumor auto-contouring was also calculated. Results: Inter-observer delineation variability resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, HDD of 5.8 mm and centroid distance of 1.7 mm. Tumor auto-contouring by the four DIR algorithms resulted in an excellent agreement with the manual delineations by the experienced observers. Mean DSC for each algorithm across all patients was greater than 0.90, whereas the HDD and centroid distances were below 4.0 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively. The CV showed a strong correlation with the DSC. Conclusions: DIR-based auto-contouring in MRgRT exhibited a high level of agreement with the manual contouring performed by experts, allowing accurate gated delivery.

Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3-5 cm). RECENT FINDINGS: We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22-90% for all techniques; 22-89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67-90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose. Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.

Treatment patterns for adrenal metastases using surgery and SABR during a 10-year period.

We studied treatment patterns for adrenal metastases using surgery or SABR at a single institution during a 10-year period. The number of patients undergoing SABR doubled since 2016, without a change in numbers undergoing surgery. Both treatments resulted in low rates of acute toxicity and similar survivals.

Relationship between Treatment Plan Dosimetry, Toxicity, and Survival following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, with or without Chemotherapy, for Stage III Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is the preferred treatment for stage III NSCLC because surgery containing multimodality treatment is often not appropriate. Alternatives, often for less fit patients, include sequential CRT and RT alone. Many reports describing the relationship between overall survival (OS), toxicity, and dosimetry are based on clinical trials, with strict criteria for patient selection. We performed an institutional analysis to study the relationship between dosimetric parameters, toxicity, and OS in inoperable patients with stage III NSCLC treated with (hybrid) IMRT/VMAT-based techniques in routine clinical practice. Eligible patients had undergone treatment with radical intent using cCRT, sCRT, or RT alone, planned to a total dose ≥ 50 Gy delivered in ≥15 fractions. All analyses were performed for two patient groups, (1) cCRT (n = 64) and (2) sCRT/RT (n = 65). The toxicity rate differences between the two groups were not significant, and OS was 29 and 17 months, respectively. For sCRT/RT, no dosimetric factors were associated with OS, whereas for cCRT, PTV-volume, esophagus V50 Gy, and contralateral lung V5 Gy were associated. cCRT OS was significantly lower in patients with esophagitis ≥ G2. The overall rate of ≥G3 pneumonitis was low (3%), and the rate of high-grade esophagitis the OS in this real-world patient population was comparable to those reported in clinical trials. Based on this hypothesis-generating data, more aggressive esophageal sparing merits consideration. Institutional auditing and benchmarking of the planning strategy, dosimetry, and outcome have an important role to play in the continuous quality improvement process.

The Impact of the Availability of Immunotherapy on Patterns of Care in Stage III NSCLC: A Dutch Multicenter Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment patterns in stage III NSCLC can vary considerably between countries. The PACIFIC trial reported improvements in progression-free and overall survival with adjuvant durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We studied treatment decision-making by three Dutch regional thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards between 2015 and 2019, to identify changes in practice when adjuvant durvalumab became available. METHODS: Details of patients presenting with stage III NSCLC were retrospectively collected. Both CCRT and multimodality schemes incorporating planned surgery were defined as being radical-intent treatment (RIT). RESULTS: Of 855 eligible patients, most (95%) were discussed at a thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board, which recommended a RIT in 63% (n = 510). Only 52% (n = 424) of the patients finally received a RIT. Predictors for not recommending RIT were age greater than or equal to 70 years, WHO performance score greater than or equal to 2, Charlson comorbidity index greater than or equal to 2 (excluding age), forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% of predicted value, N3 disease, and period of diagnosis. Between 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019, the proportion of patients undergoing CCRT increased from 34% to 42% (p = 0.02) and use of sequential chemoradiotherapy declined (21%-16%, p = 0.05). Rates of early toxicity and 1-year mortality were comparable for both periods. After 2018, 57% of the patients who underwent CCRT (90 of 159) received adjuvant durvalumab. CONCLUSIONS: After publication of the PACIFIC trial, a significant increase was observed in the use of CCRT for patients with stage III NSCLC with rates of early toxicity and mortality being unchanged. Since 2018, 57% of the patients undergoing CCRT went on to receive adjuvant durvalumab. Nevertheless, approximately half of the patients were still considered unfit for a RIT.

Thermal Ablation versus Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comparative Analysis from the Prospective Amsterdam CORE Registry.

Thermal ablation and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are techniques to eradicate colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study compares the safety, efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes of these treatment methods. All prospectively registered patients (AmCORE registry) treated with thermal ablation or SABR alone for unresectable CRLM between 2007 and 2020 were analyzed using multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression. In total 199 patients were included for analysis: 144 (400 CRLM) thermal ablation; 55 (69 CRLM) SABR. SABR patients were characterized by older age (p = 0.006), extrahepatic disease at diagnosis (p = 0.004) and larger tumors (p < 0.001). Thermal ablation patients were more likely to have synchronous disease, higher clinical risk scores (p = 0.030) and higher numbers of CRLMs treated (p < 0.001). Mortality was zero and morbidity low in both groups: no serious adverse events were recorded following SABR (n = 0/55) and nine (n = 9/144 [6.3%]; all CTCAE grade 3) after thermal ablation. SABR was associated with an inferior overall survival (OS) (median OS 53.0 months vs. 27.4 months; HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49; p = 0.003), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) per-tumor (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.52; p = 0.044) and local control per-patient (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.04; p = 0.001) and per-tumor (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.44-2.49; p < 0.001). In this study thermal ablation was superior to SABR with regard to OS, LTPFS and local control, albeit at the cost of a limited risk of serious adverse events. Further studies are required to assess whether the worse outcomes following SABR were the effect of true differences in ablative treatment or a result of residual confounding.

Survival Benefit of Repeat Local Treatment in Patients Suffering From Early Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: A uniform treatment strategy for patients suffering from early recurrence after local treatment of CRLM is currently lacking. The aim of this observational cohort study was to assess the potential survival benefit of repeat local treatment compared to systemic therapy in patients suffering from early recurrence of CRLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who developed recurrent CRLM within 12 months after initial local treatment with curative intent were retrospectively identified in Amsterdam University Medical Centers between 2009-2019. Differences in overall and progression-free survival among treatment strategies were assessed using multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were included. Median overall survival of 41 months [range 4-135] was observed in patients who received repeat local treatment, consisting of upfront or repeat local treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, compared to 24 months [range 1-55] in patients subjected to systemic therapy alone (adjusted HR = 0.42 [95%-CI: 0.25-0.72]; P = .002). Prolonged progression-free survival was observed after neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by repeat local treatment, as compared to upfront repeat local treatment in patients with recurrent CRLM within 4 months following initial local treatment of CRLM (adjusted HR = 0.36 [95%-CI: 0.15-0.86]; P = .021). CONCLUSION: Patients with early recurrence of CRLM should be considered for repeat local treatment strategies. A multimodality approach, consisting of neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by repeat local treatment, appeared favorable in patients with recurrence within 4 months following initial local treatment of CRLM.

Factors influencing multi-disciplinary tumor board recommendations in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment patterns in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vary considerably between countries, for reasons that are not well understood. We studied factors influencing treatment decision-making at thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT's) and outcome for patients treated between 2015-2017, at a regional network comprising 5 hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Details of all patients, including comorbidities, with stage III NSCLC were collected in an ethics-approved database. Weekly MDT's were conducted. The preferred radical intent treatments (RIT) for suitable patients were assumed to be concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or surgery and other therapies were non-radical intent treatments (n-RIT). RESULTS: Of 197 patients identified, 95 % were discussed at an MDT. RIT were recommended in 61 % of patients, but only 48 % finally received RIT. The estimated median OS was significantly better for patients undergoing RIT (28.3 months, CI-95 % 17.3-39.3), versus those who did not (11.2 months, CI-95 % 8.0-14.3). Patient age ≥70 years and a WHO-PS ≥2 were the most important predictors of not recommending RIT. Deaths due to progressive lung cancer within 2 years were observed in 36, 26 and 29 % of patients who received RIT, sequential chemoradiotherapy or radical radiotherapy. Corresponding comorbidity related deaths within 2 years were 3, 12 and 38 %. CONCLUSION: A large number of patients who underwent MDT review were considered too old or not fit for RIT. More effective and better tolerated systemic treatments are required for patients presenting with stage III NSCLC.

Changes in gastric anatomy after delivery of breath-hold MR-guided SABR for adrenal metastases.

Delivery of breath-hold MR-guided SABR is time-consuming, and the use of real-time tumor-tracking in a sagittal plane may fail to detect out-of-plane displacements of organs-at-risk. Analysis of daily MR-scans performed pre- and post-SABR revealed frequent decreases in stomach volumes, and in the planned stomach doses.

Resectability and Ablatability Criteria for the Treatment of Liver Only Colorectal Metastases: Multidisciplinary Consensus Document from the COLLISION Trial Group.

The guidelines for metastatic colorectal cancer crudely state that the best local treatment should be selected from a 'toolbox' of techniques according to patient- and treatment-related factors. We created an interdisciplinary, consensus-based algorithm with specific resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To pursue consensus, members of the multidisciplinary COLLISION and COLDFIRE trial expert panel employed the RAND appropriateness method (RAM). Statements regarding patient, disease, tumor and treatment characteristics were categorized as appropriate, equipoise or inappropriate. Patients with ECOG≤2, ASA≤3 and Charlson comorbidity index ≤8 should be considered fit for curative-intent local therapy. When easily resectable and/or ablatable (stage IVa), (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy is not indicated. When requiring major hepatectomy (stage IVb), neo-adjuvant systemic therapy is appropriate for early metachronous disease and to reduce procedural risk. To downstage patients (stage IVc), downsizing induction systemic therapy and/or future remnant augmentation is advised. Disease can only be deemed permanently unsuitable for local therapy if downstaging failed (stage IVd). Liver resection remains the gold standard. Thermal ablation is reserved for unresectable CRLM, deep-seated resectable CRLM and can be considered when patients are in poor health. Irreversible electroporation and stereotactic body radiotherapy can be considered for unresectable perihilar and perivascular CRLM 0-5cm. This consensus document provides per-patient and per-tumor resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of CRLM. These criteria are intended to aid tumor board discussions, improve consistency when designing prospective trials and advance intersociety communications. Areas where consensus is lacking warrant future comparative studies.

Safety and Feasibility of Additional Tumor Debulking to First-Line Palliative Combination Chemotherapy for Patients with Multiorgan Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Local treatment of metastases is frequently performed in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) analogous to selected patients with oligometastatic disease for whom this is standard of care. The ORCHESTRA trial (NCT01792934) was designed to prospectively evaluate overall survival benefit from tumor debulking in addition to chemotherapy in patients with multiorgan mCRC. Here, we report the preplanned safety and feasibility evaluation after inclusion of the first 100 patients. METHODS: Patients were eligible if at least 80% tumor debulking was deemed feasible by resection, radiotherapy and/or thermal ablative therapy. In case of clinical benefit after three or four cycles of respectively 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine and oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab patients were randomized to tumor debulking followed by chemotherapy in the intervention arm, or standard treatment with chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twelve patients dropped out prior to randomization for various reasons. Eighty-eight patients were randomized to the standard (n = 43) or intervention arm (n = 45). No patients withdrew after randomization. Debulking was performed in 82% (n = 37). Two patients had no lesions left to treat, five had progressive disease, and one patient died prior to local treatment. In 15 patients (40%) 21 serious adverse events related to debulking were reported. Postoperative mortality was 2.7% (n = 1). After debulking chemotherapy was resumed in 89% of patients. CONCLUSION: Tumor debulking is feasible and does not prohibit administration of palliative chemotherapy in the majority of patients with multiorgan mCRC, despite the occurrence of serious adverse events related to local treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This first prospective randomized trial on tumor debulking in addition to chemotherapy shows that local treatment of metastases is feasible in patients with multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer and does not prohibit administration of palliative systemic therapy, despite the occurrence of serious adverse events related to local treatment. The trial continues accrual, and overall survival (OS) data and quality of life assessment are collected to determine whether the primary aim of >6 months OS benefit with preserved quality of life will be met. This will support evidence-based decision making in multidisciplinary colorectal cancer care and can be readily implemented in daily practice.

Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic MR-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided SABR was performed for patients with lung tumors in whom treatment delivery was challenging owing to tumor location, motion, or pulmonary comorbidity. Because stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) is a novel approach, we studied clinical outcomes in these high-risk lung tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty consecutive patients (54 lung tumors) underwent SMART between 2016 and 2018 for either a primary lung cancer (29 patients) or for lung metastases (21 patients). Eligible patients had risk factors that could predispose them to toxicity, including a central tumor location (n = 30), previous thoracic radiation therapy (n = 17), and interstitial lung disease (n = 7). A daily 17-second breath-hold MR scan was acquired in treatment position, and on-table plan adaptation was performed using the anatomy of the day. Gated SABR was delivered during repeated breath-holds under continuous MR guidance. RESULTS: All but 1 patient completed the planned SMART schedule. With daily plan adaptation, a biologically effective dose ≥100 Gy to 95% of the planning target volume was delivered in 50 tumors (93%). Median follow-up was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval, 19.9-28.1). Local control and overall and disease-free survival rates at 12 months were 95.6%, 88.0%, and 63.6%, respectively. Local failures developed in 4 patients: in 2 after reirradiation for a recurrent lung cancer and in 2 patients with a colorectal metastasis. Overall rates of any grade ≥2 and ≥3 toxicity were 30% and 8%, respectively. Commonest toxicities were grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis (12%) and chest wall pain (8%). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MR-guided SABR resulted in low rates of high-grade toxicity and encouraging early local control in a cohort of high-risk lung tumors. Additional studies are needed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from the SMART approach.

Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy for peripheral lung tumors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We studied the benefits of using stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for delivery of SABR in peripherally located lung tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-three patients (25 peripheral lung tumors) underwent SMART in 3-8 fractions on an MR Linac or Cobalt-60 system. Before each fraction, a breath-hold MR scan was acquired, followed by on-table plan adaptation based on the anatomy-of-the-day. Breath-hold gated delivery was performed under continuous MR-guidance using an in-room monitor. Benefits of on-table adaptation were studied by comparing 112 «predicted¼ plans, which are the baseline plans recalculated on the anatomy-of-the-day, with the on-table reoptimized plans. RESULTS: The full SMART procedure took a median of 48 and 62 minutes on the MR Linac and Cobalt-60 system, respectively. Median SMART-PTVs were 9.5 cm3 (range, 3.1-55.6). In 14 patients who had undergone a free-breathing 4DCT, SMART-PTVs measured 53.7% (range, 31.9-75.0) of PTVs that would have been generated using a motion-encompassing internal target volume approach. On-table adaptation improved prescription dose coverage of the PTV from a median of 92.1% in predicted plans, to 95.0% in reoptimized ones, thereby increasing the proportion of fractions delivering ≥100 Gy (BED10Gy) to 95% of PTV, from 90.2% to 100.0%. CONCLUSION: Delivery of gated breath-hold SABR using MR-guidance resulted in significantly smaller target volumes than would have been the case with an ITV-based approach. Although on-table adaptation ensured delivery of ablative doses in all fractions, the dosimetric benefits were modest, suggesting that daily online plan adaptation may not benefit most patients with peripheral lung tumors.

Delivery of magnetic resonance-guided single-fraction stereotactic lung radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Single-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer, but concerns remain about the accurate delivery of SABR in a single session. We evaluated the delivery of single-fraction lung SABR using magnetic resonance (MR)-guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An MR-simulation was performed in 17 patients, seven of whom were found to be unsuitable, largely due to unreliable tracking of small tumors. Ten patients underwent single-fraction SABR to 34 Gy on a 0.35 T MR-linac system, with online plan adaptation. Gated breath-hold SABR was delivered using a planning target volume (PTV) margin of 5 mm, and a 3 mm gating window. Continuous MR-tracking of the gross tumor volume (GTVt) was performed in sagittal plane, with visual patient feedback provided using an in-room monitor. The real-time MR images were analyzed to determine precision and efficiency of gated delivery. RESULTS: All but one patient completed treatment in a single session. The median total in-room procedure was 120 min, with a median SABR delivery session of 39 min. Review of 7.4 h of cine-MR imaging revealed a mean GTVt coverage by the PTV during beam-on of 99.6%. Breath-hold patterns were variable, resulting in a mean duty cycle efficiency of 51%, but GTVt coverage was not influenced due to real-time MR-guidance. On-table adaptation improved PTV coverage, but had limited impact on GTV doses. CONCLUSIONS: Single-fraction gated SABR of lung tumors can be performed with high precision using MR-guidance. However, improvements are needed to ensure MR-tracking of small tumors, and to reduce treatment times.

A Prospective Single-Arm Phase 2 Study of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Early Toxicity Results.

PURPOSE: Use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasing in patients with localized prostate cancer, but concerns about early and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity exist after moderately or extremely hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes. Magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) was clinically introduced in 2014. MrgRT allows for SBRT delivery with smaller uncertainty margins and permits daily adaptive planning. A phase 2 study in patients with localized prostate cancer was performed to study early GI and GU toxicity after SBRT using MRgRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred one patients with clinical stage T1-3bN0M0 prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective phase 2 study. All but 4 patients had intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer, and 82.2% received adjuvant hormonal treatment. MRgRT was delivered in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy to the target volume using daily plan adaptation with simultaneous relative sparing of the urethra to a dose of 6.5 Gy per fraction. Early toxicity was studied using both clinician- (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) and patient-reported outcome measurements (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, Quality of Life Questionnaire PR25, and International Prostate Symptom Scoring). RESULTS: The maximum cumulative grade ≥2 early GU and GI toxicity measured by any symptom at any study time point was 23.8% and 5.0%, respectively. No early grade 3 GI toxicity was observed. Early grade 3 GU toxicity was 0% and 5.9% according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and scoring systems, respectively, as a result of different grading of radiation cystitis. The low incidence of early GI toxicity was confirmed by patient-reported outcome data. GU grade ≥2 toxicity peaked to 19.8% at the end of MRgRT, followed by a return to the baseline average score at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study of MRgRT in patients with localized prostate cancer observed a low incidence of early GI and GU toxicity, both in clinician- and patient-reported outcome measurements.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of 4-10 oligometastatic tumors (SABR-COMET-10): study protocol for a randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease. SABR delivers precise, high-dose, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and achieves excellent rates of local control for primary tumors or metastases. A recent randomized phase II trial evaluated SABR in a group of patients with a small burden of oligometastatic disease (mostly with 1-3 metastatic lesions), and found that SABR was associated with benefits in progression-free survival and overall survival. The goal of this phase III trial is to assess the impact of SABR in patients with 4-10 metastatic cancer lesions. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between the control arm (consisting of standard of care palliative-intent treatments), and the SABR arm (consisting of standard of care treatment + SABR to all sites of known disease). Randomization will be stratified by two factors: histology (Group 1: prostate, breast, or renal; Group 2: all others), and type of pre-specified systemic therapy (Group 1: immunotherapy/targeted; Group 2: cytotoxic; Group 3: observation). SABR is to be completed within 2 weeks, allowing for rapid initiation of systemic therapy. Recommended SABR doses are 20 Gy in 1 fraction, 30 Gy in 3 fractions, or 35 Gy in 5 fractions, chosen to minimize risks of toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, time to development of new metastatic lesions, quality of life, and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA, and tumor tissue as prognostic and predictive markers, including assessment of immunological predictors of response and long-term survival. DISCUSSION: This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SABR on clinical outcomes and quality of life, to determine if long-term survival can be achieved for selected patients with 4-10 oligometastatic lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03721341 . Date of registration: October 26, 2018.

Role of On-Table Plan Adaptation in MR-Guided Ablative Radiation Therapy for Central Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: As patients with centrally located lung tumors are at increased risk of toxicity with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR), we performed stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for such patients. We retrospectively analyzed the benefits of daily on-table plan adaptation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients with central lung tumors underwent a total of 182 fractions of video-assisted, respiration-gated SMART on the MRIdian (ViewRay, Inc). Risk-adapted fractionation was used to deliver 60 Gy in 8 fractions (n = 20) or 55 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 5). For each fraction, daily MR-guided setup and on-table plan reoptimization, based on planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints, was performed. Gated breath-hold delivery was performed under continuous MR guidance. Benefits of daily plan reoptimization were studied by comparing 168 "predicted" plans, which are the calculated baseline plans on the anatomy of the day, with the reoptimized treatment plans. RESULTS: The reoptimized plan was chosen for treatment in 92% of fractions. On-table plan adaptation improved PTV coverage in 61% of fractions by achieving superior coverage by the prescription dose (V100%) and a higher median dose (D50%). Mean increase in PTV V100% was 4.6% (P < .01) with a median of 91.2% and 95.0% in predicted and reoptimized plans, respectively. The benefits of on-table adaptation persisted in an analysis restricted to fractions in which the PTV change was ≤1 cm3 compared with baseline. On-table plan adaptation reduced the number of OAR planning constraint violations (P < .05). Maximum OAR doses remained mostly stable, with on-table reoptimization avoiding excessive OAR doses in selected cases. CONCLUSIONS: On-table plan reoptimization during breath-hold MR-guided SABR for central lung tumors improves target coverage while avoiding excessive OAR doses. The SMART approach may widen the therapeutic window of SABR in high-risk patients with central lung tumors.